File #: 2016-0352    Version: 1
Type: Motion Status: Passed
File created: 7/11/2016 In control: Law and Justice Committee
On agenda: Final action: 7/25/2016
Enactment date: Enactment #: 14697
Title: A MOTION accepting a report on the family intervention restorative services, phase 1, as required by Ordinance 18110, Section 5, Proviso P4, which amended the 2015/2016 Biennial Budget Ordinance, Ordinance 17941, Section 18, as amended.
Sponsors: Larry Gossett, Jeanne Kohl-Welles
Indexes: Budget
Attachments: 1. Motion 14697.pdf, 2. 2016-0352 legislative review form.pdf, 3. A. Family Intervention Restorative Services, Phase 1 Implementation - June 30, 2016, 4. 2016-0352 transmittal letter.doc, 5. 2016-0352_SR_FIRS_DV_Diversion_Proviso_Response.pdf, 6. 2016-0352_ATT1_Proposed_Motion.pdf, 7. 2016-0352 FIRS Proviso Response Briefing.pptx, 8. 2016-0352_SR_FIRS_DV_Diversion_Proviso_Response.docx
Staff: Curry, Clifton
Drafter
Clerk 07/26/2016
title
A MOTION accepting a report on the family intervention restorative services, phase 1, as required by Ordinance 18110, Section 5, Proviso P4, which amended the 2015/2016 Biennial Budget Ordinance, Ordinance 17941, Section 18, as amended.
body
WHEREAS, in September 2015, Ordinance 18110, Section 5, Proviso P4, which was an amendment to Ordinance 17941, Section 18, as amended, directed that $100,000 appropriated for the office of performance, strategy and budget shall not be expended or encumbered until the executive transmits a report on the implementation of a pilot diversion program for youth detained for domestic violence offenses and a motion that accepts the report and the motion is passed by the council, and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 18110 required the following information to be included in the report:
1. Data on the number of juvenile offenders booked into secure detention by offense, referrals for prosecution by offense and charges by offense filed in 2014, 2015 and 2016;
2. Data on the offenders referred to the pilot diversion program for youth detained for domestic violence offenses to include: the number of youth that were offered diversion and the amount of time that the youth remained in detention; the number of youth offered, but who refused, diversion, and the amount of time spent in detention; the number of youth who participated in the diversion program; the number of youth completing or failing diversion; the options for using existing alternatives to secure detention placements for program participants; and recommendations for any other offense types that could be eligible for a similar diversion program; and
3. Recommendations on potential options to extend this program as a pre-booking diversion alternative, and
WHEREAS, Ordinance 18110 required that the office of performance, strategy and budget consult with the prosecuting attorney's office, superior court, the department of judicial administration, th...

Click here for full text