Drafter
Clerk 07/07/2008
Title
AN ORDINANCE creating a countywide performance and accountability system, known as the performance and accountability act; amending Ordinance 11980, Section 3, and K.C.C. 2.10.010, Ordinance 11980, Section 2 and K.C.C. 2.10.020, adding new sections to K.C.C. chapter 2.10 and repealing Ordinance 11980, Section 4, and K.C.C. 2.10.030, Ordinance 11980, Section 5, and K.C.C. 2.10.040, and Ordinance 11980, Section 6, and K.C.C. 2.10.050.
Body
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
1. King County citizens demand and deserve accountability from their government.
2. County government must continuously improve its management and accountability so citizens receive maximum value for their tax dollars.
3. King County citizens should have the opportunity to be engaged in establishing priorities for their government and evaluating how well the county is meeting its goals.
4. Performance management and measurement can be an effective tool that should be used by county residents, elected leaders and policy makers to prioritize county goals and align public services and budgets to those goals.
5. Performance management and measurement should be used by elected leaders, policy makers and managers for strategic planning, program evaluation and budgeting.
6. All county agencies, departments and offices should develop a performance-based culture that can better demonstrate performance achievement and accountability to county citizens.
7. The metropolitan King County council has been a leader in promoting performance measurement in county government.
8. In 2007, the metropolitan King County council recognized the King County executive for receiving the Association of Government Accountants' certificate of achievement in performance reporting for the executive branch of county government.
9. In 2002, the metropolitan King County council adopted Motion 11561, which encouraged the executive to broaden and deepen the use of performance measurement throughout county government as a way of enhancing management of scarce resources and demonstrating accountability.
10. In 2003, the metropolitan King County council passed Motion 11739, which created a collaborative performance measurement work group to advise the county auditor and requested the executive to participate.
11. In 2004, the metropolitan King County council passed Motion 12005, which expanded the work group to include representatives from the county assessor, the King County sheriff, the King County prosecutor, the presiding judge of district court and the presiding judge of superior court.
12. In 2005, the metropolitan King County council passed Motion 12161, which called for the work group to develop a plan with feasible next steps for establishing a countywide system of strategic performance measurement and reporting that is directly linked to resource allocation decisions and is publicly reported.
13. In 2006 the metropolitan King County council passed Motion 12163, which adopted the work plan for developing a countywide strategic planning, performance measurement and management system and directed the county auditor to continue developing the system.
14. The work plan for developing a countywide strategic planning, performance measurement and management system included a recommendation to prepare revisions to county code to promote compliance with planning and performance measurement requirements. County code revisions contained in this ordinance encourage the development of a performance-based county culture that can better demonstrate performance achievement and accountability and to its citizens.
15. In 2008, King County launched the equity and social justice initiative to take aim at long-standing and persistent local inequities and injustices. In April 2008, the board of health passed Resolution 08-04 encouraging the King County council to work collaboratively with executive staff to develop and adopt a policy framework that defines the equity and social justice initiative and provides policy direction regarding the county's roles and responsibilities in promoting equity and social justice in King County. The county council is preparing a policy framework for the equity and social justice initiative which will include how the initiative shall be governed and managed.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
SECTION 1. Ordinance 11980, Section 3, and K.C.C. 2.10.010 is hereby amended to read as follows:
((The purpose of defining and implementing a system of performance measures for King County shall be:
A. Establishing clear and understandable outcomes that are accepted by policy makers for departments.
B. Seeking input from, and communicating to, the public and to county employees clear outcomes and expectations.
C. Establishing a dynamic internal process that will provide information to insure that outcomes are being accomplished.
D. Preparing and distributing to both the public and to policy makers a report on whether outcomes have been accomplished.)) The purpose of creating and implementing a countywide performance and accountability system shall be to:
A. Promote a culture of accountability within King County government;
B. Demonstrate to the public and its decision makers the county's achievement in meeting its prioritized goals;
C. Engage the public in the development of countywide priorities as part of the development of a countywide strategic plan;
D. Assist county elected leaders in making policy and budget decisions; and
E. Increase the ability of county managers and staff to improve county management and customer service delivery and assess program effectiveness.
In order for the performance and accountability system to be successful it is the intent of King County that the system shall use strategic business planning to develop high-level strategic plans for the entire county government and for each individual county agency, executive department and office. Strategic plans and annual business plans shall be directly related to the executive proposed county budget. An executive office will be created to provide leadership in and coordination of countywide performance management and measurement. It is the intent that the countywide performance and accountability system be developed and implemented in a fiscally responsible manner.
SECTION 2. Ordinance 11980, Section 2, and K.C.C. 2.10.020 are each hereby amended to read as follows:
((All words used herein shall have their common and usual meanings, except as otherwise specified below:
A. "King County" or "King County government" shall mean the council's agencies and all departments, divisions, sections, units, programs, offices and agencies of the executive branch including the department of metropolitan services and all of its functional parts.
B. "Mission" and "Mission statement" shall mean the written statement of purpose establishing the reason for which an agency of King County government exists, which shall generally be consistent with the council-adopted goals and guiding principles for the new consolidated county government.
C. "Goal" shall mean a general statement of purpose which establishes the direction for a component of an agency's mission.
D. "Objective" shall mean a statement of measurable outcomes and/or achievements within a timeframe, where applicable, which contribute toward the accomplishment of a goal.
E. "Performance measures" shall mean empirical standards which accurately reflect whether an objective has been accomplished.)) The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
A. "Accountability" means a process to set priorities, measure performance, and inspire the workforce to improve the overall performance and customer service of county government. County leadership should relentlessly follow up on commitments made in strategic and business plans and should also regularly monitor results over time to verify that change is real and sustainable.
B. "Agency" means the legislative branch, prosecuting attorney's office, superior court, district court, sheriff's office and the assessor's office.
C. "Benchmarks" means internal or external points of comparison to help understand performance results and should be used to help set targets and provide context for county results.
D. "Business plan" means a plan that reflects how individual agencies, departments, divisions or offices will contribute to achievement of the goals identified in the strategic plan during the next one to two years. The business plan provides an opportunity for continuous monitoring of the strategic plan. In addition to stating the agency's vision, mission and goals, the business plans shall identify internal and external change dynamics and strategies and evaluate how they will affect budget priorities and program direction. Business plans should be aligned with the budget and should provide performance measures that support budget decisions.
E. "Executive branch departments and offices" means all county departments and offices directly reporting to the county executive.
F. "Goals" means the results that the organization plans to achieve within a defined period of time.
G. "King County" or "countywide" means all county agencies and executive branch departments and offices.
H. "Mission statement"